Traditional Model of Special Services
|
SBE Interventions Framework
|
|
Teacher and content driven: Students who can’t keep up with the content or with peers and are often left behind or passed through grade levels without learning essential skills.
|
Learning is the constant and time is the variable: The student takes on more responsibility of his/her learning needs and is taught at a pace that is realistic with his/her needs. Learner centered.
|
|
Wait to fail model: Refer and re-refer students until enough failure has been “accomplished,” then give them services they need.
|
Early intervention: Assess all students with common assessments, track progress methodically, and intervene more intensively with students prior to significant failure.
|
|
Concerned mostly about “weaknesses” and “deficits” to fix.
|
Is equally concerned with a student’s strengths as it is with his/her challenges.
|
|
Labels: “Special education students,” “ELL students,” “Title I Students”
|
De-emphasize labels and focus on needs: “Students needing specialized instruction and intervention” (targeted and/or intensive)
|
|
Titles: “Special Education Teacher,” “ELL Teacher,” Title I Teacher.”
|
“Interventionists” where all educators work together to reach a common goal: to ensure that ALL students achieve in ALL content areas.
|
|
Educators largely are “private practitioners” and often teach in isolation of one another.
|
Blended service delivery approach: Interventionists plan and teach alongside other interventionists and Levels teachers to address students needing “targeted” and “intensive” support.
|
|
“Pull ‘em out and fix ‘em.”
|
In most situations, students learn content at their level of understanding within a collaborative environment, taught by both Levels teachers and “Interventionists.”
|
|
Students have very few ways to show proficiency (e.g., pencil/paper assignments and exams).
|
Students can demonstrate proficiency of Measurement Topics (standards) in multiple ways.
|
|
Response to Intervention (RTI) and Positive Behavior Support (PBS) are separate entities of a District’s educational system.
|
Components of RTI and PBS are embedded within the District’s Standards Based System. For example, using data-based decision making, some students will need “targeted” and/or “intensive” academic and/or behavioral services.
|
|
Special services teacher often teaches core subjects in isolation of the general education teacher.
|
Core content is learned through a myriad of approaches and settings (e.g., small group, large group, co-teaching, parallel curriculum, “double dosing,” etc.).
|
|
Student evaluations are often a “one size fits all” formal approach addressing areas that do not necessarily need to be assessed and do not always lead to clearly-defined instructional interventions. Data from formal tests required for identification and services.
|
Student evaluations are focused on the specific areas of need (and strengths) using a variety of assessment methods that directly lead to instructional intervention. Progress monitoring is essential to identification of needs and intervention!
|
|
Student Intervention Teams: Gatekeeper to services!
|
True collaborative sessions with flexible Problem-Solving Teams whose goals are to match student needs with curriculum and/or behavioral intervention.
|
|
Curriculum & Instruction is program specific and is driven by the available resources.
|
Scientifically-based curriculum & instruction and resources are driven by student need.
|
|
Separate professional development for programs.
|
Integrated professional development for interventionists.
|
|
Collaborative partners with families is not common (e.g., expert model).
|
Partnerships with parents to draw upon their knowledge and ideas is crucial (e.g., collaborative model).
|